logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.02.21 2018고단7200
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2018. 5. 30. 01:50경 서울 강남구 B에 있는 피고인이 운영하는 ‘C’ 고시원에서 그 곳에 거주하고 있던 피해자 D(여, 23세)에게 “잃어버린 휴대폰을 찾으러 가는데 같이 가 달라.”고 말하여 지하철2호선 E역 방면으로 함께 걸어가면서 갑자기 피해자의 손목을 잡아끌고 이에 피해자가 “혼자 가세요. 잡지 마세요.”라고 말하면서 거부하였음에도 피해자의 어깨에 손을 두르고 끌어안고, 이에 몸을 빼면서 피고인을 피하여 뛰어가는 피해자를 뒤따라가 팔짱을 끼면서 잡아당기고 피해자의 허리를 감싸 안았다.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Some statements concerning the suspect examination protocol of the defendant;

1. A written statement;

1. Notification of a department related to reporting 112 cases;

1. Investigation report (verification of video recording and video recording at the site);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the closure of CCTV-recording images;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the same Act concerning the crime, selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Article 47(1) and Article 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Exempted from Disclosure Orders, Notification Orders, and Employment Restrictions Orders; the proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse; the proviso to Article 56(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse; the content and method of the crime; the circumstances after the crime; the risk of recidivism of sexual crimes appears to be low; the Defendant appears to have the effect of preventing recidivism even if having completed personal information registration and treatment programs for sexual bomb; and other social benefits and sex expected by the disclosure order, notification order, and employment restriction order.

arrow