1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to the Defendant A’s KRW 75,959,869 and KRW 21,159,213 among them:

B. Defendant B is Defendant A.

1. The facts of recognition are as shown in the annexed sheet of claim;

[Ground for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 5

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendants are obligated to pay the money set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article to the plaintiff.

B. Defendant C alleged that the Plaintiff’s claim should be dismissed because it applied for credit recovery to the Credit Counseling and Recovery Committee, but it is not possible to extinguish the obligation or refuse the performance of obligation solely because it applied for credit recovery. Thus, Defendant C’s claim is without merit without further examination.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and all of them are accepted.