logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.04.03 2014고단4754
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 14, 201, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) proceeds from the opening of a road one-lane in front of a luminous luminous-dong at a luminous time from the boundary of the luminous station at the luminous-dong.

In the long-distance intersection, the right of way was made after stopping.

The road is a three-distance intersection, and the vehicle traffic is frequent, and there are other vehicles that intend to make a right-handion on the right-hand side of the vehicle driven by the Defendant at the time, so there was a duty of care to safely avoid accidents by checking the passage of other vehicles when a person engaged in driving a vehicle stops and starts the vehicle, so that the vehicle does not go against the next vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to drive a vehicle without a driver’s license and neglected the safety distance with the next vehicle, and thereby by neglecting the safety distance with the Defendant’s vehicle immediately adjacent to the Defendant’s vehicle, and thereby making a right-hand in the right-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle, the Defendant was also able to receive the front-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle driving vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as fluoral salt, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, due to the above negligence.

2. On April 14, 201, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) and the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) drive B Poter truck not covered by mandatory insurance without a vehicle driver’s license at a section of about 2 km from the street near the luminous-dong to the front-distance intersection of the luminous-dong at the same time from the luminous-dong to the luminous-dong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. The actual condition survey report and photographs;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Each investigation report (general) and application of Acts and subordinate statutes regarding mandatory insurance;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act.

arrow