Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

The defendant is running a package business in the name of "C" in Silung City B.

1. The owner or employee of a business establishment banned from allowing access by and employing juveniles who violate the duty of prohibition of access by and employing juveniles shall verify the age of access persons and shall prohibit juveniles from entering or using the business establishment concerned;

Nevertheless, at around 23:00 on May 3, 2014, the defendant entered the above package, which is a business establishment prohibited from juvenile access, without verifying the age of D and E.

2. No person who sells alcoholic beverages shall sell to juveniles drugs harmful to juveniles;

Nevertheless, at the above date, at the above place, the Defendant received and sold 24,000 won in total, such as 2 illness, beer, 2 disease, and beer, and beer, saly, etc., which are drugs harmful to juveniles to D, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A criminal investigation report;

1. Each statement;

1. Notice of a business subject to administrative disposition;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 59 subparag. 8, 29(2) of the Juvenile Protection Act (Violation of Restriction on Access to Juveniles), Articles 59 subparag. 6 and 28(1) of the Juvenile Protection Act (the sales of harmful drugs to juveniles), and the choice of fines (the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects his mistake in depth while recognizing the crime of this case, and the defendant has no specific penalty power except once a fine is imposed, etc.);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014).

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.