1. Defendant Counterclaim Co., Ltd.:

A. The land and building indicated in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

On February 7, 2013, Ulsan Metropolitan City, including the status of the parties and the progress of the project, determined the designation and maintenance plan of the E-Housing Redevelopment Project Improvement Zone and the topographic map for the area of the real estate in the area of this case, including the building (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building” in the attached list; hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”) and the above ground buildings (including the land indicated in the attached list; hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”) owned by the Plaintiff on February 7, 2013, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan Metropolitan City, including the land in this case, and announced the designation and maintenance plan of the E-Housing Redevelopment Project Improvement Zone and the size of 81,90 square meters, and the E-Housing Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project Promotion Committee (hereinafter referred to as the “Redevelopment Improvement Project Promotion Committee”) was established in the area of the instant real estate located within the boundary of the real estate, including the land.

On the other hand, H was the chairman of the redevelopment improvement project promotion committee, and the plaintiff was the vice-chairman.

Defendant Mutual Association is a regional housing association established to implement a new apartment construction project (hereinafter “housing construction project”) using the Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government FF zone including the instant real estate as a project site, and the Defendant Company is a company that vicariously performed the prop work of the project site including the instant real estate.

In order to promote a housing construction project, the Defendant Company entered into a contract for purchasing real estate of 40,012.44 square meters including G, a licensed real estate agent, and the instant real estate, and entered into a contract for purchasing real estate of 40,012.44 square meters. On November 2014, the Defendant Company entered into a contract for acting as an agent with G, a licensed real estate agent, and the Chairperson of the Regional Housing Association (tentative name) and one asset trust (hereinafter “one

G notified the Plaintiff, who was the vice-chairperson of the committee for the promotion of redevelopment project on July 2014, that the redevelopment project was planned to implement the housing construction project in the real estate unit of this case and requested the revocation of the designation of the housing redevelopment project zone

Defendant Company: