Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a cuss car in B.

On August 8, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 18:18, and led to the intersection of the private distance in 1576-2 at the west-dong 1576-2 of the Papju to the intersection from the right side of the road.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely according to traffic signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and received the part of the victim C(38 tax) driving in front of the car driving in the direction of the Defendant, which was left to the port from the right side of the direction of the Defendant pursuant to the new subparagraph due to the negligence of the vehicle heading behind the stop.

In conclusion, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, injury to the victim C, such as brain-dead sugar, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, injury to the victim E (the 35-year old-age-old victim E (the 35-year-old victim), which requires approximately eight weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the same victim F (the 2-year-old victim) including the right-free frame, which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of C;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of photographic Acts and subordinate statutes attached to the investigative direction;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 40 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence is not that the defendant's negligence causing an accident in violation of the signal, but that the degree of injury of the victims is not weak.

In addition to comprehensive insurance, consideration shall be given to the fact that the injured party does not wish to punish the defendant, and that there is no significant criminal history by giving and promising to pay money equivalent to the sentencing date.