beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's action against the members of the defendant corporation shall be dismissed.
2. Defendant Self-Governing Co., Ltd. shall be the Plaintiff 747,987.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The Plaintiff’s status, etc. as the parties to the case is the “A Apartment-gu” (hereinafter “instant apartment”).
(2) Defendant self-government is a project undertaker who constructed and sold the instant apartment, and Defendant members are the contractors of the instant apartment construction work. The Defendant members are the contractors of the instant apartment construction work.
3) On March 15, 2011, Defendant Guarantee Corporation (former title: Housing Guarantee Co., Ltd.) made the petitioner group and the principal debtor as the Defendant’s members with respect to the instant apartment on March 15, 201, the Defendant Guarantee Corporation (former title: Housing Guarantee Co., Ltd.) as indicated below (hereinafter “instant Guarantee Contract”). The Defendant Guarantee Corporation’s warranty contract for this case’s apartment is the “instant Guarantee Contract”).
[Attachment 1] The [Attachment 1] Guarantee Guarantee Form No. 1 C 148,893,906 from March 18, 2011 to March 17, 2012, 2D372,234,765 from March 18, 2011 to March 33, 2013, E 297,787,812 from March 18, 201 to March 17, 2011 to March 13, 2011, Plaintiff 23,340,859 from March 18, 2015 to March 17, 2014, Plaintiff 3,201-3, which was changed from March 18, 2011 to March 17, 2014.
B. As to the construction of the instant apartment, the Defendant member failed to construct or alter the part to be constructed in accordance with the design drawing in the construction of the instant apartment, or performed defective construction, thereby causing a defect such as rupture and water leakage in the common area and the section for exclusive use of the instant apartment. As a result, there was an obstacle to the function and safety of the instant apartment. (2) From June 16, 201 to June 16, 201, the Defendant self-managed and the Defendant members did not properly implement the instant apartment even though they were requested by the Plaintiff to repair the defects of the instant apartment.