1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. A. On October 16, 1913, the Plaintiff’s father B, the father of the Plaintiff, was assessed on the answer C, G, Yang-gun, Gyeonggi-gun, with the assessment of 1,250 square meters (hereinafter “instant assessment land”).

B. On February 12, 1958, the above land was restored to the cadastral area of 293 square meters and 957 square meters for D railway sites. On October 17, 1977, the conversion of each of the above land into the area on October 17, 1977, and on March 30, 1979, the said D railway site of 293 square meters (969 square meters) was divided into the land indicated in paragraph (1) of the attached Table No. 824 square meters for D railway sites, the land listed in paragraph (3) of the attached Table No. 1 of 130 square meters for F railway sites, and the land listed in paragraph (3) of the attached Table No. 157 square meters for E railway sites (3,164 square meters) and the land listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table No. 1,515 square meters for H railway sites, and the land listed in attached Table No. 4 of 1,168 square meters for I railway sites.

C. Since then, the above J became K in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu due to its administrative district change, and the land located on the G land in Yangju-gun of Gyeonggi-gun was merged with 146,240 square meters of the land in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, like each of the instant land on January 10, 201. On January 27, 1989, the remaining land except for Eul (hereinafter “each of the instant land”) was combined with 146,240 square meters of the land in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

On the other hand, the registration of preservation of ownership in the name of the defendant (management agency: Korean National Railroad) was completed as of February 8, 1972 by the Seoul Northern District Court Registry No. 4769 on each land of this case.

E. The deceased died on March 5, 194, and the plaintiff, a family head heir, inherited the deceased on his own.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to Gap evidence 2-2, Gap evidence 3-2, Gap evidence 4-2 to Gap evidence 5, the purport of whole pleadings

2. A person who is registered as the owner in the Land Survey Division or the Forest Survey Division with respect to the cause of the claim shall be considered as the owner of the land unless there is any counter-proof such as the change in the contents of the situation by the adjudication.