1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 19, 1910, the land research division drafted in the Japanese Occupation Period, stated as follows: “D” was written in the land research division drafted in the Japanese Occupation Period, stating that “D” was subject to each of the circumstances, namely, the land assessment No. 1 and the land assessment division established in Gwangju City E, Gwangju, 2,623 (hereinafter “the instant case”) and FJ large 299 square meters in Gwangju City (hereinafter “hereinafter “the land assessment division”) and the land assessment division established in the Japanese Occupation Period.

B. The land of this case was partitioned into G or H as the land pointed out around March 20, 1953. Of them, the land category I 402 square meters (1,329 square meters) was changed into a road.

After that, the 402 square meters of the above I road was 1,329 square meters of the I road in Gwangju-si through the conversion registration of the area, change of administrative district, etc. on October 5, 1977, and later, on February 15, 2002, the part indicated in the annexed drawing (A) is the former part of the I land.

[A] Part (A) of the above part is Da. The land of this case was restored on August 15, 1961 to the land of this case. The land of this case was partitioned into J or K on September 28, 1974, and the land category was changed to the road of this case, along with the division. The land category was changed to the road of this case. The above C road of this case 72 square meters was changed to October 5, 197 with the conversion registration of the area and change of administrative district of this case on October 5, 197, while the land of this case was divided into J or K on September 28, 197. The land of this case was 238 square meters of the road of this case (hereinafter referred to as the “land of this case”). The land of this case was 1

D. The Defendant completed the registration of initial ownership on March 14, 1996 with respect to the above land B including the instant land No. 1 and the instant land No. 2. Meanwhile, on the other hand, on July 4, 1941, the Plaintiff’s prior owner of L died, and on December 28, 1965, the son was succeeded to Australia, and his heir died on December 30, 1986. The heir died on December 30, 1986, and the Plaintiff was one of N’s children [based on recognition], the Plaintiff did not dispute over the facts that there was no dispute over the issue, Gap’s evidence No. 1 through 10, and Eul’s evidence Nos. 3 through 5 (including the numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply).

each entry of this section.

2. The Parties.