beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles) is that the defendant had no intention to injure the defendant, and even if the defendant did not do so, he was in a situation where he was aware of any shock or she was aware of any shock on the part of the catus by using a catus catus at least three weeks prior to the occurrence of the instant case, the victim tried to satisfy the defendant, use the surrounding parts of the defendant's snow, use the satisfy and face to her hand, thereby suppressing the victim to prevent an excessive act of the victim before the defendant arrives at the police. Thus, the defendant's act does not constitute a legitimate act.
2. Determination
A. As the court below properly explained with respect to the assertion that there was no intention of injury, in light of the situation at the time of the occurrence of the instant case, the degree of violence inflicted by the Defendant on the victim, the degree of injury inflicted on the victim, etc., at least dolusent negligence of injury
It is reasonable to view it.
Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
B. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the assertion that an act constitutes a justifiable act, namely, the victim committed a dispute with the defendant as a matter of settlement of the price with the defendant, and did not commit any act against the defendant, and there was no act against the defendant. Nevertheless, the defendant committed an act against the victim, kneeing the victim beyond the floor and continuously divided the victim into knee with the victim, thereby causing injury to the victim in need of 6 weeks of medical treatment, such as the chest left left left and knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, snee, snee, slefrhee, etc., the defendant's act did not meet all the requirements for a justifiable act in light of the motive, purpose, means or method of the act.
The decision is judged.
Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is also possible.