logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.03.07 2018가단105665
소유권이전등기
Text

1. Each Plaintiff A corporation:

A. As to the share of 20/1707 square meters in Echeon-si H-si H 1707 square meters, Defendant C shall be liable for 20/1705.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) entered into a land sales contract with Defendant C, D, E, and F (hereinafter “Defendant C, etc.”) with the content that the Plaintiff would sell each of the land indicated on the subject matter of sale to Defendant C, etc. as listed in the following table:

(2) The Plaintiff, Defendant C, etc. agreed to reduce the purchase price by 2% in the event that the remainder is fully paid within one week from the date of conclusion of each sales contract, at the time of concluding each of the above sales contracts.

Plaintiff

A was fully paid 2% reduced by Defendant C, etc. within the time limit pursuant to the above agreement.

Of the purchase price (won) of the subject matter to be sold as the buyer on October 8, 2015 C 1 C 4889 square meters on the date of the purchase and sale contract, 23 square meters out of the 16,50,000 square meters of 20 square meters of 16.5 square meters among the land No. 16,50,000 2 D 16.5 square meters of 16.5 square meters on October 16, 2015; 3 square meters of 6243 square meters (hereinafter “land”) on February 17, 2016; 21,490,0004 square meters of 23 square meters of 16.5 square meters among the land No. 16.35,00,000 square meters (hereinafter “land”) on October 8, 2016; 15,000 square meters of 640 square meters (hereinafter “land”) 16.5,205 square meters (hereinafter “the land”).

B. On August 27, 2015, Plaintiff B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”) entered into a land sales contract with Defendant G with the content that Plaintiff B would sell KRW 33 square meters of 827 square meters in Ma-si, Leecheon-si (hereinafter “six-si”) to Defendant G for KRW 29,80,000 of the purchase price (hereinafter “the sixth-party sales contract”), and that the sales contract was collectively referred to as “the instant sales contract”).

At the time of concluding the 6th sale contract, Plaintiff B and Defendant G entered into the 6th sale contract, and Defendant G entered into the ownership transfer registration corresponding to the size of the purchased land.

arrow