The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts and legal principles merely stated that the victim was experienced by an officially recognized victim, and the defendant did not constitute a crime of insult because it does not decrease the victim's social evaluation. The defendant's use of the above questioning comments does not constitute a crime of insult, and the defendant's use of the above questioning comments does not constitute a crime of insult, and the defendant's use of "a woman" is merely a limited expression, and it does not constitute a crime of insult, and it does not constitute an expression "a woman" as it does not constitute a crime of damaging the victim's social evaluation, and it does not constitute an expression "a woman" as it does not relate to the victim, and thus does not constitute a crime of impairing the victim's social evaluation, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged against the

B. The lower court did not render a judgment as to the assertion that the Defendant’s above paragraph (a) and the victim were officially recognized, and thus, should be strictly recognized as to the offense of insult. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the omission of judgment.

(c)

Sentencing (Punishment of the lower court: Fines 1,000,000)

2. Determination

A. Determination of misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of the legal doctrine 1) The term “defluence” in the crime of insult refers to the expression of an abstract judgment or disfluence that could undermine a person’s social assessment without mentioning the facts.

In a case where a certain article contains a judgment or opinion containing an insulting expression in particular, if such expression can be seen as an act that does not contravene social norms in light of the sound social norms in the era, there may be cases where the illegality may be determined exceptionally under Article 20 of the Criminal Act, but in a case where the content and degree of such expression are the motive, purpose, and the defendant.