logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.08.26 2016가합71375
퇴거청구
Text

1. The defendant shall leave the building indicated in the attached Table 2 list to the plaintiff A District Urban Development Project Association.

2. The plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The status of the parties 1) Plaintiff A District Urban Development Association (hereinafter “Plaintiff Association”)

2) In order to create a residential complex according to the method of land substitution under the Urban Development Act (hereinafter referred to as “instant urban development project”), the head of the Si/Gun/Gu may implement an urban development project to create a residential complex within 325,27

2) The Defendant is a company that owns buildings listed in the attached Table 2 list (hereinafter “instant building”) and obstacles listed in the attached Table 3 list (hereinafter “instant obstacles”) on the land listed in the attached Table 1 list (hereinafter “instant land”) owned by D and operates the “E golf practice range.”

B. 1) The Plaintiff Mutual Association obtained authorization of an implementation plan for the instant urban development project on April 24, 2015, and obtained authorization for a land substitution plan on August 20, 2015. On August 24, 2015, the Plaintiff Mutual Association completed the designation of a land substitution plan within the instant urban development project zone, including the instant land. Following the designation of a land substitution plan publicly notified by the Plaintiff Mutual Association, the Plaintiff Mutual Association obtained authorization for a change in the said land substitution plan on August 25, 2015 and October 15, 2015.

C. Upon the public announcement of a development plan to designate the instant reserved land, which was a natural green belt area, as a commercial site, the occupants of H apartments adjacent to the instant reserved land for replotting, the instant reserved land for replotting, which was the instant reserved land for replotting, filed a civil petition with the Plaintiff Union. The Plaintiff Union is located in the land adjacent to the instant reserved land in the process of gathering the opinions of the residents involved in the instant reserved land. If the instant reserved land is included in the urban development zone, the instant reserved land for replotting is included therein.

arrow