logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.12.14 2016고정1016
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of a Bbea cruise car.

On April 8, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at a low speed on April 16:13, 2016, and the front road in the Jung-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, is proceeding at a low speed in the direction of a short distance from the opposite market.

At that time, the signal is an intersection where a signal is installed, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to proceed in accordance with good faith.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left in accordance with normal signals in the middle-class shopping direction at the end of the Madon distance from the time off by negligence in violation of the signal, and received the front right side of the E-Radon car from the victim D ( South, 48 years old) as the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of wood, which requires medical treatment for about two weeks, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. The actual survey report and the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. A medical certificate (the defendant asserts that he intentionally received the vehicle of the defendant. However, according to the evidence adopted and examined by this court, the facts constituting the crime in the judgment are judged to have been proven, and no other circumstance exists to support the defendant's assertion. The defendant's assertion is acceptable). The application of the law is without merit.

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow