The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The judgment of the court below that recognized the misunderstanding of facts based on the victim's statement although there is insufficient objective proof that the victim suffered malute from the rape of this case due to the rape of this case.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court (three years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) The lower court consistently stated to the effect that “the victim had sexual intercourse for the first time at the time of the instant case, was asked to be her from beer and beer at the time of beer and beer.” The lower court stated in the court of the lower court to the effect that “the victim was asked to be her beer in beer and bee and her bee and her bee and satise. At the time of the instant case.” The lower court stated to the effect that “The victim was well aware of the fact at the time of being her bee and her bee and satise and her bee and satise in beer.” This statement was not deemed to have been satise and her bee and satise by Internet search without any specific, detailed, emergency or contradictory part, and that the victim was 15 years old at the time of the instant case, and that the victim could not have any motive or reason to resist the Defendant, considering the circumstances in its reasoning, determined that the victim’s statement or mor was not her body’s credibility.