Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of three million won, by a fine of one million won, by a defendant B, and by a fine of two million won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a ready-mixed borrower who has entered into a contract for transportation of ready-mixed with F Co., Ltd. and is engaged in activities as a president of the G labor union H sub-council. Defendant B is a ready-mixed borrower who has entered into a contract for transportation of ready-mixed with F Co., Ltd. and works as a head of G labor union H sub-council and as a head of F Co., Ltd. at the same time. Defendant C is a ready-mixed borrower who entered into a contract for transportation of ready-mixed with J Co., Ltd. and works as a head of the education and publicity department of the G labor union sub-chapter I.

G labor-management H I subdivisions constitute a trade union under the Labor Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act, since the borrower claimed the "recognition of the status of the borrower of ready-mixed," etc. that entered into a contract for transportation with ready-mixed companies in Ulsan-do (one kind of construction machinery, a fixed name, a concrete mixed truck) and jointly sought his/her interests, or the business owner who is not a worker because the borrower has no subordinate relationship with the ready-mixed company, and thus, the G labor-management He subdivisions do not constitute a trade union under the Labor Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act.

Nevertheless, with respect to the case of a contract for the transportation of ready-mixeds between ready-mixed companies and its affiliated ready-mixeds, the GMH sub-council claimed that “collective collective bargaining is conducted” with Lebs User organizations, such as the Ulsan-do Lebs and Industry Association, and “the increase of transportation cost,” “the reduction of long-time hours,” and “the preparation of a standard rental contract,” under the premise that the said I sub-council is a legitimate trade union, but from April 3, 2013, the I sub-council against the nine sub-contractors in the Ulsan-si where the said I sub-councils belong to, from around April 3, 2013, the said I participated in collective action against the said nine sub-contractors, such as “the refusal of collective transportation,” “the front of the Lebs and agro-mixed companies,” “the front of the Lebs and the other sub-contractors of the Lebs.”

On the other hand, F Co., Ltd. has caused interferences with the sales business of ready-mixeds with the "collective refusal of transportation by Lebs."