A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On October 18, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1,500,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Suwon District Court’s Ansan Branch on October 18, 2013, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4,00,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Southern District Court on March 11, 2014.

On May 24, 2014, the Defendant driven a 300-meter C car from the front day of the home flusium in the administrative department of the local government in the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Inquiry into the enemy;

1. Previous convictions: Investigative inquiries into foreign crimes and investigation records, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal investigation reports (prior convictions and confirmations of the same type);

1. Relevant statutory driving for a crime: Article 148-2 (1) 1 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act: Subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 of the same Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Taking into account all the circumstances, including the following facts: (a) the Defendant was sentenced twice to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without obtaining permission) as stated in the judgment before the judgment; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he was sentenced to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without obtaining permission); (c) the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration at the time of the instant crime; and (d) the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration at the time of the instant crime; and (c) the Defendant’s criminal records, etc., it is deemed that there is a high risk of preventing the instant crime from