The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant should consider equity with the case of fraud, etc. at the same time as the judgment of the defendant, and the fact that the amount actually acquired by the defendant is not much much, in light of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, or the fact that the method of the singing crime is becoming fast and the damage is increasing, it is necessary to strictly punish the persons involved in the crime. The defendant has been in charge of taking over the access media and taking charge of the liability for withdrawal of cash that is important for the crime. The defendant has used for the crime above. The number of victims is large, the amount of damage is large, and the damage is not recovered, and other various circumstances shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the punishment imposed by the court below was proper and exceeded the reasonable limit of discretion of the judgment of the court below.

There are no circumstances such as evaluation or maintenance of it is deemed unfair.

Therefore, since the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.