The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are circumstances such as the Defendant’s confession of the instant crime and the fact that the Defendant reached an agreement with the victim M during the trial, the Defendant had been subject to criminal disposition more than ten times, including that sentenced to criminal punishment for the same kind of crime, and the instant crime also was committed during the repeated crime period. As seen earlier, even though the Defendant agreed with some of the victims in the trial, and as such, it seems that the degree of damage has been recovered as the Defendant agreed with the victim, it still appears that the degree of damage was not yet significant. In full view of all other circumstances that form the sentencing conditions indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, occupation, circumstance and contents leading to the instant crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the lower court cannot be deemed to be excessively unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.