Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 12:00 on April 18, 2014, the Defendant carried out telephone conversations between the victim C and the victim’s cash 50,000 won, resident registration certificate, and one verification-defluence card of the new bank and the Korean bank, each of which consists of one copy of the cash 50,000 won belonging to the victim, which the victim left the window, was able to use a cash withdrawal machine.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Photographs description (victims' trade and suspect's trade paper);

1. Written replies to the provision of financial transaction information;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (specific suspects);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Jung-gu District Court on April 4, 2012, and is under the suspended sentence of one year and three years, and even though he was sentenced to a prior sentence of a fine due to a crime committed during the suspended sentence, he/she again again commits the instant crime, there is a necessary aspect for strict punishment against the defendant.

However, in order to collect money from the defendant, the defendant entered the automated copier of the agricultural cooperative, and there is some exemption from considering the circumstances that the defendant was able to report the wall, which was placed on the window framework of the windowpane after cash withdrawal, resulting in a contingent crime, the defendant appears to have committed a crime, the victim's attitude to confession and reflect the crime, the victim's damage was recovered, the victim was the victim's wife by agreement with the victim, and the habituality of the defendant is denied as seen below, and the imprisonment of this case is finalized.