logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.08.11 2014가단9686
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff intended to start a franchise business through AB. B, on March 2014, 2014, the Plaintiff sought explanation of the Defendant’s headquarters of the franchise business and approval for the establishment of a franchise store. On April 10, 2014, the Plaintiff’s 104 out of the building D and E’s above ground buildings (hereinafter “instant store”).

2) On April 13, 2014, the Plaintiff paid KRW 3,300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. (2) B agreed to substitute for part of KRW 3,33,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,0000,000,000,0000,000,000,0000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000).

3) On April 23, 2014, B received the written form of the Indian construction contract from the Defendant and began construction from May 8, 2014. Upon the Defendant’s request, B paid KRW 94,594,500, which is KRW 70% of the construction cost on May 9, 2014, as advance payment. 4) On May 8, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant drafted a franchise agreement on the right to operate the Defendant’s franchise store (hereinafter “instant franchise agreement”).

B. The producer of the channelA’s “G” program, a general programming broadcasting company for the Defendant’s response, is not a natural punishment house, but a frying of H H Ppam products of the store specializing in the spam management, which is a harmful substance.

arrow