logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.12.12 2017노1954
사기
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the Defendant intentionally did not pay a traffic accident listed in the annexed crime list. Therefore, the Defendant did not have the intent to obtain the insurance money from the victim insurance companies due to each of the above traffic accidents.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found all of the facts charged of this case guilty is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

B. The sentence sentenced by the court below to the defendant (one hundred months of imprisonment and two years of suspended sentence) is too unreasonable.

2. The summary of the facts charged has been engaged in driving duties using truck from around 28 years to the present.

From November 6, 2006, when the Defendant subscribed to the four driver insurance contracts such as the accident insurance for the modern marine driver, he would compensate for the increased automobile insurance premium due to the automobile accident, regardless of the degree of minor accident. The Defendant intentionally caused contact by using the fact that it is possible to make a fixed amount of insurance premium and to receive the insurance premium even if multiple insurance policies are subscribed to the related special agreement regardless of the degree of minor accident.

On April 12, 2008, the Defendant was parked subsequent to a vehicle driven by the Defendant while driving a F New Airport on the road in front of Southyang-si on April 12, 2008.

On or around April 14, 2008, the part of the part of the G Kaman-Engine was partially shocked with the part of the crime at the top of the above cargo vehicle, and around July 7, 2008, to the employee belonging to the victim Samsung T&A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Samsung-Co., Ltd.”), the employee belonging to the victim M&T Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Samsung-Co.”), the employee belonging to the employee belonging to the victim M&T Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim M&T fire”) on or around July 7, 2008, and the employee belonging to the employee belonging to the employee belonging to the victim M&z Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Samsung-Co., Ltd.”).

arrow