1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, who is qualified as a certified sports leader with respect to active skills, was active as a member of the “victim’s bereaved family organization with forced mobilization during the period of a large-scale dispute” and became aware of the Defendant, a member of the same organization in around 2011.

B. From April 2014 to February 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) sought consolation money from the government from April 2014 to February 2015 that the Defendant’s external accommodation constitutes a victim of compulsory mobilization; and (b) sought a procedure to file

C. The Defendant is the owner under Section 401 of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul High-dong No. 401, the Plaintiff’s wife D against the Defendant as the preserved right, and applied for provisional attachment as to the above apartment owned by the Defendant as the Jeonju District Court 2014 business group125, and the above court made a decision of acceptance on December 17, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the cause of the claim;

A. The plaintiff provided the defendant with labor or service as follows, while the defendant provided that he would pay the plaintiff a fee or remuneration, he did not take any measures up to now.

Work or service provided by the Plaintiff to the Defendant is a total of KRW 2,320,000 as follows:

① On June 26, 2014 and June 27, 2014, the Plaintiff provided the Plaintiff with labor in preparation for data collection application documents, etc. to apply for government consolation benefits. The amount of the Plaintiff’s royalty is KRW 120,000 (20,000 x 6).

② On October 11, 2014, the Plaintiff, at the Defendant’s request of the head of the Dong, complaining of his/her body and the head of the Dong, took part in the visit activation movement procedure on a total of six occasions from October 11, 2014 to November 10, 2014, and the charge is KRW 600,000.

③ From February 9, 2015 to February 26, 2015, the Plaintiff, while accompanying the Defendant to apply for consolation benefits by visiting an administrative agency, subsidized the Defendant’s work. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s earned income that the Plaintiff did not receive is KRW 1.6 million (4 million x 4 days).

(b).