All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment of 10 months, confiscation, additional collection of 20160,000 won, Defendant B: imprisonment of 8 months, suspended execution of 2 years, probation, community service, 160 hours, confiscation, additional collection of 8.64 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendants led to confession and reflect on the instant crime.

B. However, even though Defendant A was sentenced to the suspension of indictment for the same offense as the instant case on October 2013 due to the violation of the Food Sanitation Act, Defendant A committed the instant crime, Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment for 8 months due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc., Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence for 2 years due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc., and the size and the operating period of a sexual traffic business establishment operated by the Defendants, with heavy nature of the crime, the act of arranging sexual traffic by illegally employing foreign women, and other various circumstances that are favorable to the Defendants, such as the Defendants’ age, details of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

C. Therefore, the Defendants’ above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to do so, and it is so decided as per Disposition.