beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On November 5, 1956, Nonparty C, married with D, gave birth to the Defendant, and divorced from D, and on September 30, 1961, Nonparty C, who was divorced from Nonparty E on September 30, 1961, was divorced again on November 30, 1972.
After that, on April 23, 1974, C gave birth to the Plaintiff between Non-Party F, and on February 21, 1980, C married with E and entered the Plaintiff into the name of E, and lived with the Plaintiff, Defendant, and E.
B. After that, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of each of the five real estates as indicated below (hereinafter “each of the instant real estates,” and each of the individual real estates is “real estate Nos. 1 through 5” according to the sequences as listed below.
The former owner of real estate had completed the registration of ownership transfer on December 7, 1989, G G 265 square meters E on December 7, 1989, the former owner of the ownership before the location of real estate, and on November 10, 1993. The former owner completed the registration of ownership transfer from H on April 7, 1998, and he again completed the registration of ownership transfer from H on December 7, 198, 200 to J 661 square meters E on December 7, 1989, Defendant 3, the former owner of the real estate, on December 10, 2000/2000 of the shares of Defendant 3 Gwangju Mine-gu J 661 square meters on December 7, 1989, for Defendant E and Nonparty 2, 102 square meters, Nonparty 4, 102 square meters on December 12, 1990, Nonparty 5, Defendant 1, 2004.
C. E died on September 13, 1992, and thereafter, each of the instant real estate was expropriated in the Republic of Korea on the ground of the acquisition of a public site between December 23, 2009 and January 4, 2012, and the Defendant received compensation for expropriation of each of the instant real estate from the Republic of Korea.
Afterward, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff KRW 50,000,000, around March 2012, and KRW 150,000,000, around October 2012.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 9 (including each number), witness C's testimony 2.