Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a taxi driver.

1. On April 6, 2018, the injured Defendant: (a) rejected the victim D’s attempt to board a taxi in front of Suwon-si, Suwon-si B and C’s street while parking the vehicle and leaving a rest; (b) thereby, the injured Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, i.e., the victim, who walked the vehicle to walk on the taxi, making the vehicle a stop, leaving the vehicle a stop, and taking a part of the victim’s inside the body of the vehicle one time, resulting in the victim’s injury, i.e., “brain, having no head open address,” which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant committed violence at the same time and place as the above Paragraph 1, and at the victim E, who was in the same line as above Paragraph 1, and committed violence by booming the victim’s breath with her hand, and making the victim’s breath in a candle and drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Damage photographs;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that ① the defendant did not commit any harm by assaulting D, and ② violence against E constitutes self-defense.

First of all, the following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, are ① the contents of the statements made by the victim D investigation agency and this court, are very specific and consistent, and the contents of the statements are not contrary to or contradictory to the empirical rule by itself; ② the contents of the statements made by the witness F investigation agency are consistent with the above victim’s assertion; ③ the images of the photographs taken by the victim’s bodily injury immediately after the instant case are consistent with the above victim’s statement; ④ according to the contents of the witness G investigation agency’s statement, the defendant was unable to witness the victim’s bodily injury; ④ According to the witness G investigation agency’s statement, the contents of G’s statement are inconsistent with those of the victim’s statement, but G has already assaulted the above victim.