logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2014.08.12 2013가단44920
물품대금
Text

1. The defendant shall pay 22,880,600 won to the plaintiff and 20% per annum from January 4, 2014 to the day of complete payment.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff asserted that during the period from June 9, 201 to May 14, 2012, the plaintiff supplied the defendant with landscaping facilities, such as land shelters and chairss, and did not receive KRW 22,880,60 out of the price of the goods. Accordingly, the defendant asserted that the defendant prepared and submitted a quotation to C (D Company) that supplied the goods by the plaintiff while taking charge of estimate and business as the head of the plaintiff's business, and that there was no fact that the goods were supplied by the plaintiff.

2. In full view of the purport of each statement of evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including virtual numbers) in the board, the Plaintiff and the Defendant set the unit price of landscaping facilities supplied by the Plaintiff between June 9, 201 and May 14, 2012, and supplied landscaping facilities, such as land shelters and chairs, and received 22,880,600 won out of the unit price of the goods. On the other hand, the Defendant concluded a goods supply contract under the name of the Plaintiff and sent the goods price to the Defendant’s deposit account. In light of the fact that, after determining the unit price of landscaping facilities supplied by the Plaintiff between the Plaintiff and the Defendant and the Defendant’s account, the Plaintiff did not know that it was difficult for the Defendant to conclude a contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant to transfer the goods price to the Defendant’s account, the Plaintiff did not have the ability to receive the notice of goods supply under the terms and conditions of the contract between the Defendant and the Defendant’s deposit account.

The defendant entered into a contract for the supply of goods with the unit price of landscaping facilities set by the original and the defendant, rather than with C.

arrow