logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.12.17 2015고합144
미성년자의제강간
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years, for one year and six months, and for two years and six months, for Defendant C, respectively.

(b).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. At around July 2014, the Defendant came to know of the Victim J (L, 12 years of age) through the mobile phone “I” application, and came to know L while participating in the organization dialogue of the organization of K “K” as the victim’s draft, and was aware of L on August 16, 2014, around November 11, 2014, the Defendant had sexual intercourse with the victim and L under the age of 13 at the distance from the near and in the vicinity of the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Mountainous Station.

B. From August 2014, the Defendant agreed to have a sexual intercourse with the victim through a mobile phone “K” display, and around 02:0 to 03:00 on August 00, 201, the Defendant first entered the guest room located in the number of the nel located in Seongdong-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, and waiting for the victim. At around 03:30 to 05:00 on the same day, the victim was sexual intercoursed twice with the victim under the age of 13.

2. On June 2014, Defendant B came to express his intention of refusal on the Defendant’s early August 2014 when he came to know of the Victim J (Y, 12 years of age) through the mobile phone display “P” method, and sent the victim’s cell phone, and sent the victim’s cell phone with a video call or sent a photograph with one another through several times, and the victim expressed his intention of refusal on the Defendant’s early August 2014, Defendant B entered the victim’s mother’s “I” display the victim’s “I” sign the screen to the effect that “the victim’s mother exchanges and takes pictures with the victim’s baby and divided them.” If the victim did not take the victim’s obscene demand, the Defendant sent the victim’s cell phone, and then threatened the victim with the victim, which was frighted, to have the Defendant and the victim make one-time video conversations with the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant had the victim do an unobligatory act.

3. Defendant C

A. On May 2014, the Defendant came to know of the Victim J (J, 12 years of age) through the cell phone “P” application.

arrow