logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.02.05 2014고정968
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In Jeju District Court D auction, the victim C was awarded a bid for the land E and its ground Fpention in the amount of KRW 577,500,000,000, which was owned by the defendant, and acquired and operated the ownership on December 23, 2009.

On October 28, 2013, the Defendant received the registration of ownership transfer from G for the reason of sale on October 22, 2013 with respect to the land of the victim and the land of Jeju, Jeju, adjacent to Fpenta, and the land of H and its ground I.

1. Since the above land owned by the victim and the Fpention surrounded by the above land, etc. surrounded by the Defendant’s ownership, there was no alternative passage available for vehicle traffic without using the land owned by the Defendant for operating Fpention. Accordingly, according to the cited decision on July 3, 2014, Jeju District Court 2013Kahap1019 filed an application against the Defendant for a provisional injunction against interference with traffic on the land owned by the Defendant, the road was constructed by securing a passage of 4 to 5 meters wide from the road width leading to a Fpentation on the land owned by the Defendant.

At around 10:30 on July 14, 2014, the Defendant issued a complaint on the victim’s own land to set up a road width of 4 to 5 meters, and at the entrance of the management office of the Defendant’s operation at Jeju-si, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s work by force by obstructing the victim’s passage by blocking the passage of the truck loaded with sand and the vehicle operated by the victim, under the circumstances where the victim opened the management office from the entrance of the Jeju District Court to the Fgate to the Fgate, based on the ruling on temporary injunction against the passage obstruction of the passage of the Defendant.

2. On July 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 07:00 on July 15, 2014, at the entrance of the IO’s office, intended to park one ton truck owned by the Defendant and enter the victim’s pension.

arrow