logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2013.05.07 2012고단1025
문서은닉
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The Defendant: (a) was a person who is substantially in charge of the lease management of a 6th floor building (E building) above D in the name of the wife C; (b) the victim F leased No. 601 to operate an English private teaching institute; and (c) the Defendant agreed to establish a right to lease on a deposit basis against the said 601 against the victim.

On April 6, 2012, the Defendant received from G real estate brokers G a certificate of lease on a deposit basis, a copy of lease contract, a certified copy of resident registration in the name of the victim, and a document bags related to the establishment of chonsegwon containing a letter of delegation, from the real estate broker G, who had worked in his/her office in the 1st floor lease office of the building in Daegu-gu, Incheon-gu.

However, the Defendant continued the establishment of the right to lease on a deposit basis agreed with the victim, and the victim returned the documents related to the establishment of the right to lease on a deposit basis. However, the Defendant did not return the documents related to the establishment of the right to lease on a deposit basis, and did not return the documents related to the establishment of the right to lease on a deposit basis.

2. According to the evidence presented in the judgment, it is recognized that the Defendant: (a) received bags containing documents related to the establishment of the right to lease on a deposit basis, which he left from G on April 6, 2012; (b) the Defendant opened an envelope and confirmed its content; and (c) called “dunes on the books” and re-dried G with the envelope; and (c) G had the envelope on the books that he used for his business.

Since then, G showed that the subject matter of the above plastic bag was placed on the book of the plastic bag in the past, but it was stated that the plastic bag did not seem to be located on the book, and the defendant asserts that the location of the above plastic bag is ambiguous at present.

G during the time when the above office was not opened at the time of this case.

arrow