1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 2,000,000 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from October 26, 2013 to August 12, 2015.

(b) A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed to be filed together)

1. The Defendant (a person qualified as a certified public accountant and is demoted at the National Tax Service Education Center as a visiting professor) owns a penthouse (hereinafter “the instant penthouse”) in Gyeyang-gun, Gyeonggi-do since 2007. The Defendant is operating the instant penthouse in the instant penthouse and raising 3 pentle at the end to provide the pentle users with riding experience. The Plaintiff is living in the vicinity of the Plaintiff, while living in the vicinity of the Plaintiff and living in the field (hereinafter “the instant field”). The Plaintiff is called as “the field of dry field” in this case.

) The Plaintiff is owned by the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff cultivates the instant dry field, which is growing a tent, dynas, etc., and F manages the instant penta with the Defendant’s instructions from August 31, 2012, under the direction of the Defendant, while managing the instant penta.

On May 28, 2013 and 29. Accordingly, on May 30, 2013, the Defendant’s horse, which fell outside the fence, destroyed the Defendant’s dry field of this case and damaged the Defendant’s seeds, etc., which were depthd into the dry field of this case (at the time, the Defendant was not in the instant dry field) by entering the dry field of this case (the Defendant did not in the instant dry field), and the F agreed that the Plaintiff would pay KRW 1 million for damages, but did not pay it thereafter.

On October 24, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a complaint (a statement with the purport that, at the time of making a supplementary statement of complaint, the Defendant damaged the Plaintiff’s dry field by using horses) against the Defendant’s charge of causing property damage (around May 30, 2013, the Plaintiff’s statement was made to the effect that, at the time of making a supplementary statement of complaint, the Defendant, going through the Plaintiff’s farming field and damaged the Plaintiff’s agricultural crops that were deep in the Plaintiff dry field), but was subject to a disposition of suspicion on October 29, 2013. The Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Seoul High Prosecutors’ Office, which again was dismissed on December 10, 2013 while the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Seoul High Prosecutors’ Office, and that disposition of non-prosecution was made.