logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2019.06.19 2019고단487
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a marina business with the trade name of “C” located in the Northern Port B.

No one shall commit any act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. for business purposes.

Nevertheless, from January 31, 2019 to April 4, 2019, the Defendant provided guidance to unspecified male descendants who had found the above business place and received KRW 50,00 or KRW 100,000 from female workers, and provided guidance to the room in which female workers are employed. However, the Defendant provided guidance to the employees D, E, F, G, and H (the suspension of indictment on the same day) of the nationality of the Thailand with money of KRW 30,00 to KRW 80,00 in return for money of KRW 30,00 or KRW 30,00,000 and arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

The Defendant is a person who operates a marina business with the trade name of “C” in the north-gu Port B of the Republic of Korea.

If a foreigner intends to be employed in the Republic of Korea, he/she shall obtain a type of qualification for employment activities, as prescribed by Presidential Decree, and no person shall employ a foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

Nevertheless, from March 19, 2019 to April 5, 2019, the Defendant employed the status of stay (B-1) that is not capable of engaging in job-seeking activities as an employee, and employed Thailand F and G as an employee who received status of stay (B-1) that is not capable of engaging in job-seeking activities at the same business establishment from March 18, 2019 to April 5, 2019, and employed the status of stay (B-1) that is eligible for job-seeking activities at the same business establishment from March 18, 2019 to April 5, 2019.

Accordingly, the defendant employed 5 foreigners who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of E, D, F, H, and G;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Investigation reports (related to seized articles) and C Thailand.

arrow