logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.04.01 2015고단3245
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Grand Car.

피고인은 2015. 9. 23. 22:05 경 김해시 덕 정로에 있는 관동 교 앞 삼거리 교차로를 덕정 교 방면에서 세 영리 첼 아파트 방면으로 좌회전하여 진행하게 되었는데, 그 곳은 보행자 신호등이 설치된 횡단보도가 있는 곳으로 운전업무에 종사하는 사람에게는 전방 및 좌우를 잘 살펴 횡단보도를 횡단하는 사람이 있는지 확인하고 안전하게 운전하여 사고를 미연에 방지해야 할 업무상 주의의무가 있음에도 불구하고 이를 게을리 한 채 그대로 진행한 과실로 녹색 신호에 횡단보도를 차량 진행 방향 좌측에서 우측으로 횡단하던 피해자 C( 남, 17세) 의 우측 몸통과 머리 부위를 가해 차량 앞 부분으로 들이 받았다.

Thus, the defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as brain salvy which requires about 12 weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement related to a traffic accident (C);

1. A traffic accident report, a traffic accident actual investigation report, and an accident scene photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a general medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following grounds for sentencing, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant);

1. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended punishment] shall be the basic area (from April to October) of the type of general traffic accident (the person causing a traffic accident) (the person who has no special aggravated or mitigated punishment);

2. The traffic accident of this case, where the defendant makes a left-hand turn, is caused by negligence that has not verified whether or not there is a pedestrian on the crosswalk in the left-hand side of the proceeding direction, and the degree of violation of the defendant's duty of care is grave, and the victim is the victim.

arrow