A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On October 21, 2010, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Jeju District Court on the same day and August 12, 2014 at the same court.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 01:30 on February 21, 2015, the Defendant driven a e-car under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of about 0.095% at the section of about 3 km from the front of the race distance, which is located in the Dondo-dong at Jeju to the front day of the same city.

2. At around 01:30 on February 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) discovered that the vehicle driven by the Defendant is driving towards India, and (b) discovered that the vehicle driven by the Defendant would differ from the circumstances belonging to the F District of the Jeju East Police Station in the Jeju East Police Station; and (c) moved the vehicle from the driver’s seat to the chief lighting; (d) requested a drinking measurement on the ground that the vehicle was smelled by the said G; (c) the Defendant raised the dissatisfaction; (d) while taking a bath to the said G; (d) displayed the drinking while taking a bath to the said G; and (e) caused the said G to be dried, the said G was carried with the gun carrying in the left-hand gun of the back-hand box; and (e) assaulted the chest part of the said G on twice the breast part of the said G by drinking the vehicle.

As such, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties of police officers with respect to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes, and damaged public goods by destroying the test amounting to 49,500 won per market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. A written statement prepared in the I;

1. Report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver, and notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Written estimate;

1. A damaged photograph (the tear tear, clothes, or theme);

1. Previous records before ruling: Application of criminal records, repeated statements and investigation reports (attached to summary orders)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (1) 1, Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (a point of sound driving) concerning a crime, and Article 136 of the Criminal Act.