logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.31 2017고단1943
식품위생법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

Defendant

A fails to pay the relevant fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of the agricultural corporation B in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D4, and the defendant corporation B is a company that manufactures food and others.

1. No one shall indicate or advertise that foods have efficacy or effect in the prevention and treatment of diseases, or that foods are likely to be confused with medicine or health functional foods;

around July 2016, the Defendant stated that “H” is effective in the forepart of “F,” “F,” “G,” and “H,” which are foods manufactured by Company E, as “H,” and that “H is effective in the increase of immunity, blue blood, energy, fire-fighting, piter, piter, and current climatic cliff,” and that it is difficult for a person who has a large amount of harmful insects, together with the SJP SP SP SP SP Spaer’s propagation and harmful insects to be fluor, and that the head is inconvenient, spaththm, spaththm, spathm,4thm, snow, change, and beneficial fluort,” together with the explanation that it is easy for the head of the FP SP SP SP SPer to flus, fluort, fluort, fluent, fluent, flut.

The Security Department shall assist in improving symptoms by promoting the creation of fluoral fluorals, fluoral, fluoral, fluoral, fluoral, fluoral, and reducing toxic emissions;

It is helpful to the immunity of the body.

From the 12th day of the same month to February 15, 2017, a total amount of KRW 89,425,500 was sold over 385 times, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached crime, by stating that “the efficacy and effect exists in the prevention and treatment of the disease, or that there is likelihood of confusion as pharmaceutical products or health functional foods, or attaching them at the entrance of the place of business.”

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. violated the above temporary location, and A, the representative director of the Defendant, as described in paragraph (1) above with respect to the Defendant’s business.

arrow