1. 1.5 months (from April 27, 2020 to April 2020) on which the Defendant made against the Plaintiff on April 21, 2020 restriction on qualification for participation of unjust enterprisers in bidding.

1. Details of disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company that operates civil engineering and construction business. The Defendant is a quasi-presidential public corporation under Article 5(3)1(b) of the Act on the Management of Public Institutions (hereinafter “Public Institutions Operation Act”).

2) On May 29, 2018, three companies, including the Plaintiff, entered into a contract on the instant construction works with the Defendant (from June 1, 2018 to May 31, 2019) (hereinafter “instant construction works”; hereinafter “instant contract”); and hereinafter the Plaintiff’s employee C worked as an agent on the instant construction site from April 22, 2019 to the instant construction site pursuant to Article 53 of the Act on the Management of the Public Institutions by Defendant D Public Institutions, the provisions of Article 129 of the Criminal Act, such as acceptance and advance acceptance, are deemed public officials.

Around that time, the construction supervisor was employed.

B. On April 9, 2019 to June 12, 2019, the Defendant issued 0: C’s 1 and D meal as shown in the table 1 and 2 below; and on April 21, 2020, on the ground that “the relevant public official offered a bribe of less than 10,000 won in connection with the execution of the contract” (hereinafter “instant entertainment”); 39 subparag. 2 of the Act on the Management of Public Institutions; 15 of the Rules on the Contract of Public Corporations and Quasi-Governmental Institutions; 40 U.S. 10 to 40 U.S. 10 to 10. 50 to 40 U.S. 20 to 10. 40 to 9. 7. 20 to 9. 7. 206 of the former Act on the Contracts to which the State is a Party (amended by Act No. 1739, Jun. 9, 2020; hereinafter “former Contract Act”).