The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The sentencing of the lower court (one hundred months of imprisonment, and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that the Defendant had committed the instant crime, which is against depth while making a confession of all the instant crime, the Defendant voluntarily surrenders to the investigative agency on the day following the instant crime, and the fact that the instant crime was committed once more than 22 times, including the fact that the Defendant was sentenced 10 months of imprisonment for the same kind of crime and was sentenced to criminal punishment for a total of 29 times. In particular, the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that he was under repeated crime, in light of the sentencing of the same similar case, the lower court appears to have determined the punishment by taking into account the favorable circumstances for the Defendant, and taking into account the motive and background of the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, and other various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant records and arguments, it cannot be deemed that the sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition