A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 25, 2018, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in the first floor parking lot of building B in Sungwon-si, Changwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on May 25, 2018. However, upon receiving a report from 112 that a person is under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant demanded the Defendant to operate patrol cars to the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Masan Special Metropolitan City, where the Defendant was located, without any justifiable reason, to be urged to return home from the police officer belonging to the police station C of the Changwon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

The defendant was unable to operate patrol cars in the area beyond his jurisdiction, but he was allowed to get off the patrol cars to the bus stops in the vicinity of the bus stops, after hearing the answer that the patrol cars cannot be operated in the area beyond his jurisdiction.

The Defendant, at the center of the window of Changwon-si, around 07:00 on the same day, arrived at the bus stops prior to the viewing of Changwon-si, 151, and the Defendant, even though she requested to leave the house of his own defendant and demanded again to the house of his own defendant, and demanded again that he cannot operate patrol cars without jurisdiction from D, she did not so.

Chewing fela n. Ne. Ne.

Madern with mind.

“,” and “Nein”

Does the police;

Babbage moss, unflabs.

Chewing franch h., which did not go from the back seat of the patrol vehicle while carrying out a bath as “mast franch h.”, and after getting off from the patrol vehicle to the end of the Defendant’s house, it was impossible to operate the patrol vehicle to the end of the patrol vehicle, and then, she was called “math h.b.

D, “I d,” whose personnel is “I thrown away from what is.”

“Along with the walking of the clothes of D,” and assaulted by the walking of the clothes of D.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's protection measures and legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of people's life, body and property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A report on investigation (on-site mobilization conditions);

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as photograph of crime;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution (the following sentencing grounds)