The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud on April 19, 2013 and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 27, 2013.

The Defendant had no intention or ability to pay the fee, meal, etc. to the victim.

Nevertheless, as if the CPC located in Busan-gu from 06:30 on October 2, 2012 to 21:20 on the same day would bring about money to the victim D, it would be false as if it were to pay money to the victim D, and it would be 15,000 won and 21,000 won of food beverage value, such as would be PC 15,000, and would be PC 15,000 won, and PC 15,000 won, which would be PC 21,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal records, previous convictions, results of confirmation, case search, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and the former part of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act exempted from punishment ( Taking into account the fact that the degree of damage is not significant, and the equality with the case that a judgment becomes final and conclusive simultaneously with the case);