Attached Form

The Defendants indicated in the list “1” of real estate refers to the money indicated in the “3 purchase price” column in the same list.

1. As to Defendant B, E, G, and H

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Judgment made by deeming confessions: Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act;

2. As to Defendant D and F

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Judgment by service: Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act;

3. As to Defendant C

A. Facts of recognition 1) The Plaintiff shall be 52,184m2 (hereinafter “instant rearrangement zone”) in Daegu-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, pursuant to the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (Amended by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23, 2013).

(2) The reconstruction project of this case (hereinafter “the reconstruction project of this case”)

(2) For the purpose of implementing the project, the head of the Daegu Metropolitan City month and the head of the Gu obtained authorization to establish the association on June 5, 2012, and completed the establishment registration on June 25, 2012. The Plaintiff was the owner of the building listed in the [Attachment 8] list located in the instant improvement zone (hereinafter “instant building”) and registered as the establishment of the association from the head of the Daegu Metropolitan City month and the head of the Si/Gun/Gu on August 2, 2018 after obtaining a resolution on the “approval for the establishment of the association and the consent for the project plan” at the general meeting of the association held on December 2, 2017.

3) On August 30, 2018, the Plaintiff’s peremptory notice demanding the Defendant to reply within two months to determine whether to participate in the instant reconstruction project (hereinafter “instant peremptory notice”).

4) The Plaintiff sent a copy of the instant complaint to the Defendant on November 9, 2018, and served the Defendant with the notice at that time, but the Defendant did not reply within the above period. (4) The Plaintiff expressed his intent to exercise the right to demand sale of the instant building by serving the copy of the instant complaint on the Defendant. The duplicate of the instant complaint was served on the Defendant on November 9, 2018

【Facts without dispute over the ground for recognition, and the number with Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 10 shall be the number.