logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.06.08 2017고단1624
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 2, 2016, the Defendant, at around 09:40 on December 2, 2016, stated that “D” smoking rooms located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Namcheon-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “D”) in the victim E (46 years of age) was sleep, and caused the victim’s face and bridge by drinking and sleep, and caused the victim’s injury to the victim, such as the influence of the number of days of treatment.

The Defendant, on August 6, 2017, 2017, 202:14 on August 6, 2017, 2017, 10,000 won in cash, which was owned by the victim in another floor, 10,000 won in cash, one resident registration certificate, one motor license, one copy in the Agricultural Cooperative, two new cards, one for the Saemaeul Credit Card, one for the Saemaeul Credit Card, and one for the Saemaeul Credit Card.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 1624"

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. The remainder of the report (e.g., details of dispatch to the scene) excluding statements made by E and H;

1. On-site photographs "2017 Goyle 2143";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Each investigation report (CCTV investigation);

1. On-site reports (affixing photographs, etc. to extractCCTV images);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs extracted from each CCTV image;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor) on criminal facts, and Article 329 of the Criminal Act (the point of intention and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order

1. The summary of the argument is that there was no 2017 senior group 1624 case and there was no her talk with the victim E, and there was no her talk about the victim E.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following facts can be acknowledged.

1) The victim E was assaulted to the police officer dispatched immediately after the occurrence of the instant case.

Defendant at the same time.

arrow