The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant, as the former representative director of C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”), owns approximately 4.4% of C’s shares, and the victim D is the current representative director of C.

The Defendant requested the victim to peruse the accounting books of C, but the victim did not show all the accounting books, thereby making the victim raise a complaint.

On May 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) in the C Office located in Ansan-si around 15:20 on May 21, 2015, even though the injured party did not manipulate the accounting data or embezzled C’s funds, the Defendant is in need of time to manipulate data on the part of the victim’s name and wounded, etc.

Mena Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. operate the cosmetic.

I said, “The Republic of Korea can only be said to be legally and legally.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. Dismissal of a public prosecution indicating the victim's wish not to prosecute after the prosecution is instituted (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act).