Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

[2015 High Court 1149]

1. The Defendant, at around 15:00 on July 16, 2015, on the ground that: (a) the Defendant: (b) the victim E (n, 50 years old) who is the owner of the “D” beauty room located in the same commercial building; (c) while performing the instant interior construction, the Defendant’s call to the victim on the ground that the chemical portion owned by the Defendant displayed in one’s front before the warden interfered with the interior works; and (d) the chemical portion displayed in one’s front before the warden interfered with the interior works; and (c) whether the Defendant’s call to the victim;

The victim threatened the victim as if he would cause any harm to the victim by stating that he would not be able to say that he would be fright to a son’s right that he performs funeral services in the past for a period of several hundred and twenty years, and that he would not be able to make a funeral in the commercial building be lost, and that he would die.

2. Around 15:30 on the same day as the above 15:30 day, the Defendant sought the victim E by “D” 29 underground of the commercial building as indicated in the above 1 paragraph (1), and used the victim as “I Nana,” and used the parts displayed on the Nana and the passage of the victim, as the victim would be booming about drinking and booming the victim, and as the victim would be booming against the victim.” The Defendant assaulted the victim by booming the victim by body.

[2015 High Court Decision 1187]

3. The Defendant interfering with the business from March 1, 2015 to July 1, 2015 refers to the following: “Around the 30th anniversary of the victim F’s operation of the commercial building underground set forth in the above paragraph (1), the Defendant engaged in chemical distribution business, etc. by displaying the fire parts owned by the Defendant before the victim’s “G” entrance, thereby hindering entry into “G” and hindering entry; as the victim’s demand was obstructed, the Defendant refused to comply with the victim’s demand to remove the said chemical parts; “Adembling violence from the time of the apartment sale, was organized; and around 30 years prior to the time of the apartment sale; and, as such, the Defendant has the right to obtain approval.”