logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.12.09 2016고합365
강도상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 12, 2016, at around 17:25, the Defendant: (a) boarded the victim’s private taxi in the vicinity of the Seocheon-si Station (60 years of age) around 17:35 on the same day; (b) sought to depart from the taxi without paying the taxi fee, and (c) sought to get out of the taxi at around 516 business bank, the 57:35 on the same day, the 17:35 day, Seocheon-si, Incheon-si, at the seat of the 516 business bank; and (d) the victim tried to get out of the taxi without paying the taxi fee; and (d) the victim took the vehicle of the victim who driven away from the seat of the taxi and gets out of the parked taxi, and corrected the driver’s seat after getting aboard the taxi.

At this time, the victim, by opening the back door of the driver's seat and the door of the driver's seat, tried to put the defendant in and let the defendant by hand, and the driver's seat opened in the Gap-si taxi, used the victim's body to use the victim's body on the road, and escaped by driving the taxi.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the victim to suppress his resistance, and took the 7 million won taxi at the market price to force him, and inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the failure to treat the victim for about two weeks, the chilling of the chill, the chilling of the cream, and the chilling of the chilling.

2. Around July 12, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicle) operated a taxi immediately after taking the cab of C on the front of the 516 Enterprise Bank, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-do, Gyeonggi-do, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City) around 17:35.

Since the above road has a possibility of pedestrian traffic in the crosswalk, there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by checking the traffic situation of the rear side in the driver.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected his duty of care and neglected to do so, and caused the victim to go beyond the road by using the taxi driver's seat door of the victim E (the 88-year old) who walked the above road due to the negligence of the cab going behind the taxi.

Ultimately, the Defendant is above.

arrow