A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

A public prosecution against the violation of the Labor Standards Act among the facts charged in the instant case.

The criminal history room (2014 high-class 587) was the construction site of the medical waste disposal facility located in the AI of Jung-do Jung-gun, Jung-do and the defendant was required to pay 1 billion won at his/her own expense to undertake the entire construction work, and the defendant was unaware of money from the victim AJ as if he/she subcontracted the environmental part of the above construction work to the victim AJ.

1. On December 16, 2009, the Defendant called the victim at the F Office located in Ma permanently at permanent residence on the phone of December 16, 2009 and provided that the director of AK, who is the ordering office, personally borrowed money from another construction company and agreed to pay the company the borrowed money. Accordingly, the Defendant borrowed KRW 20 million from 20 million.

However, the Defendant, as a person with bad credit standing at the time, was unable to subcontract because he was unable to bear one billion won of the construction cost of the medical waste disposal site. Therefore, even if he borrowed the above money from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to repay it.

Therefore, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 15 million from the victim on the same day.

2. On January 18, 2010, the Defendant called the victim by telephone, and made a false statement to the victim, stating that “The establishment of a collateral security should be terminated on the site of medical waste in the fixed-line. It was already allocated 10 billion won to the new bank and the enterprise bank with the facility fund. To execute this, the Defendant made a false statement to the new bank and the enterprise bank stating that the collateral security should be terminated, as it is necessary to terminate the collateral security, to lend KRW 50 million at the termination cost.”

However, there was no intention or ability to repay it for reasons such as Paragraph 1.

Therefore, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received from the victim the money of KRW 20 million on the same day and KRW 30 million on the following day.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.