logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.10.29 2012나91066
손해배상
Text

1. Of the parts against Defendant C Co., Ltd. in the judgment of the court of first instance, the amount exceeding the following payments:

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company engaged in the development, manufacture, and sale of software; Defendant C (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is a company engaged in online games and other software development business; Defendant B is the representative director of the Defendant Company.

B. Defendant B, along with Defendant B, established the Plaintiff on August 24, 2006, as well as Defendant B, who was the representative director of the Plaintiff, and was employed as the joint representative director of the Plaintiff on June 30, 2008, and thereafter retired from the Defendant Company on July 16, 2008. (2) At the time when Defendant B retires from the Plaintiff, Defendant B retired from the Plaintiff and entered the Defendant Company by withdrawing the Plaintiff.

C. Defendant B’s release of the Plaintiff’s materials from the Plaintiff, and around June 12, 2008, Defendant B, the head of the management support team around June 12, 2008, planned the Plaintiff’s L Development Plan No. 27-1 through 27.

9. The planning of this case (hereinafter referred to as “instant planning”).

) All the development data, including others (hereinafter “instant development data”).

(D) The Plaintiff and the Defendant Company’s online game development Plaintiff developed a social network and community-oriented online game under the name of “L” after its establishment. On March 6, 2009, the Defendant Company, on the Internet game site, opened the online game video under the name of “MM display video,” and thereafter, offered the “N”, which is a smartphone mobile game after its retirement, and brought them out to its own accommodation, unlike the G. Defendant B received D’s claim and returned three of the HP. D. The Plaintiff and the Defendant Company’s online game development data, which were the trade secret of this case, while leaving the Plaintiff.

arrow