A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 shall be confiscated from the accused.

Punishment of the crime

On August 9, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc., in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch on August 9, 2013. On June 13, 2015, the Defendant completed the enforcement of the sentence.

[2015 Highest 1154]

1. At around 17:00 on August 11, 2015, the injured Defendant sought to kill with the victim D (the 43 years of age) who is a female living together in his/her own residential area, and talked that the victim would have a good talk about the Defendant’s friendship, and that he/she would talk with the Defendant’s friendship, or that he/she would be "N's speech that he/she would talk with the Defendant." The injured Defendant, in both hands, 2:3 times more than 2 to 3 times more, and the victim’s buck and the bucks of the victim, walking the victim’s buck and the bucks of the victim, thereby causing the victim to have a hole for her face in the number of days of treatment.

2. Special intimidation: (a) at the same time and place as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant: (b) laid down a bags for kitchen use, which is a dangerous object placed on the floor to be hosing and hosing, with the victim’s bodily injury; (c) and (d) took the victim’s face, and threaten the victim’s face.

In addition, two knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.

[2015 Highest 1350] The Defendant, around 02:20 on September 13, 2015, 2015, was an employee at the restaurant and the victim G (52 years of age) who had been a customer from the restaurant on the ground that the Defendant did not ordered food at the restaurant, “F” in the name of “F,” which was located in the Guang City E, did not lead the Defendant to the said employee to see that the victim’s Ga (52 years of age) who had been a customer was “I would like to see why the talk would have not been finished,” and then, “the defect of talking out of the restaurant” came out of the restaurant along with the victim’s horses.

The defendant continues to be in front of a restaurant.