The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The defendant who misleads the defendant of the summary of the grounds for appeal does not have any assault against the victim.

It seems that the victims seem to be assaulted by the defendant and recorded it.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant guilty and erred by mistake.

The punishment sentenced by the court below (the amount of 500,000 won) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The judgment of the court below and the court below as to the assertion of facts revealed by the evidence duly admitted by the court below and the court below revealed the following circumstances, namely, victim F and B consistently and specifically stated from the investigative agency about the dispute as soon as the defendant and how they used violence, such as displaying stick, etc. The defendant who recorded the CD in this case is not admissible. However, it seems that the defendant who had already consented to the use of the CD in this case as evidence in the court below, and completed evidence lawfully. The CD in this case can not be withdrawn evidence opinion because it is acknowledged that the defendant recorded the original copy as being copied without any artificial outline such as editing in the process of copying the original copy, and it is recognized that the statement was made in a reliable state, in light of the background and place of recording, the contents of conversation, and the relationship between the conversationr, etc., and thus, it is sufficiently recognizable that the defendant used the CD in this case's statement was admissible through a narrow conversation between the defendant and the above victim (No. 14, 2012).