logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.08.19 2015노850
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act provides that the driver of any motor vehicle shall immediately stop the motor vehicle and take necessary measures, such as providing assistance to casualties in the event that he/she causes death or injury to other persons or damages goods by traffic, and the driver of any motor vehicle is punished in violation of Article 148 of the Road Traffic Act;

Since the above provision is a general provision on relief measures in the event of traffic accidents that govern the occurrence of human damage, including where necessary measures are not taken after the occurrence of human damage and where necessary measures are not taken after the occurrence of physical damage, it cannot be separately determined by distinguishing the duty of relief from the duty of relief and the duty of relief for the damaged part.

Therefore, in the case of this case, both the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unclaimed Measures after Accidents) are applied, and each of the above crimes is in a relationship of regular concurrence.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant about the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unclaimed measures after the accident) among the facts charged in this case is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles.

2. Determination concurrence refers to a case where a single act actually satisfies several constituent elements, and legal concurrence refers to a case where a single act appears to meet the constituent elements of several crimes in appearance, or actually constitutes only one crime. Whether a single crime is actually one crime or several crimes should be determined in terms of the evaluation of constituent elements and the legal interests and interests to be protected.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 84Do782, Jun. 26, 1984; 2002Do6033, Apr. 8, 2003). In addition, the special relationship, which is a form of a legal landscape agreement, is established where a certain constituent element should be included in all other constituent elements, and the special relationship is established where the elements of a special law should be satisfied.

arrow