logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.08.25 2016고단3612
업무상횡령
Text

The accused shall publicly announce the summary of the judgment of innocence.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person in charge of managing and executing the Village Fund as the Chapter C in Pakistan-si from 2010 to the present date.

From October 1, 2012, the Defendant and the residents of the above C filed a civil petition with regard to the construction of the “E golf course” located in D, in Pakistan, and convened. Accordingly, the E golf course was transferred from the E golf course to the post office account in the name of the head of the village fund or the meeting, which is the cost of civil petitions, such as community development fund or meeting, and the Defendant kept the said amount in order to cause damage to the village residents in the course of business.

Nevertheless, on July 31, 2013, the Defendant transferred KRW 7 million to the post office account (Account Number I) in the name of the Defendant’s deniedr (hereinafter “first deposit”) among village funds kept in the account in the above F name at the post office of the mail office of the Simju-si on July 31, 2013, and used at will the Defendant’s credit card price, living expenses, etc. around that time.

On October 4, 2013, the Defendant continuously transferred KRW 3 million to the above post office account in the name of H, the Defendant, among village funds kept in F’s account at the above place (hereinafter “second deposit”) and then arbitrarily used the Defendant’s credit card payment, living expenses, etc. around that time.

On September 26, 2014, the Defendant continuously transferred KRW 4 million among village funds kept in F’s account at the above place, to the Agricultural Cooperative account (Account Number K) in the name of the J travelr in the name of the village resident, and then the J travelr L said that “the amount wrongfully remitted is returned” to the J travelr L, and received KRW 4 million from the above post office account under the name of the Defendant’s denial of payment (hereinafter “third deposit”) under the name of the Defendant’s return, and around that time.

arrow